The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Magioladitis (talk) 16:29, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lydney Town A[edit]

Lydney Town A (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Lydney Town F.C. is notable, but the club's 3rd string team does not merit its own standalone article -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:12, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as speedily as possible. I don't see how an amateur club's third team can ever be considered notable.--Michig (talk) 21:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Has no claim to notability. Unusual? Quite ^TalkQu 21:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wikipedia is not Facebook. Nfitz (talk) 05:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Govvy (talk) 13:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 17:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - club's third team who have no notability in their own right. Mention of their existence and current division in main club article is all that is required. - fchd (talk) 21:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Amateur side, non-notable. –  LATICS  talk  23:03, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.