The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

M66 derby[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No third-party reliable sources to show that this is a notable derby. A quick google search only finds one passing reference in a RS. So, probably fails WP:GNG. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:58, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 18:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:NRIVALRY is quite clear that such articles must satisfy GNG. Regardless of the specific name, the fact that two teams have played each other a number of times does not automatically create a notable rivalry per GNG. Significant, independent coverage of the rivalry as a notion in itself are required and I do not see this here. Fenix down (talk) 07:00, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.