The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect, if the edit war continues over this redirect, I would recommend WP:RFPP. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 04:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MHE[edit]

MHE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The article does not satisfy notability requirements, and in fact gives no indication of notability. It also has no sources of any kind.

The article was just part of a brief edit war (see the article's history); I contacted both editors involved and asked them to stop, and as part of this, I'm nominating the article for deletion to get consensus on whether either version belongs in Wikipedia. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 15:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete, CSD A7, there's no reason to look for notability if the article makes absolutely no claim to importance. Redfarmer (talk) 15:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I've removed the speedy tag since this discussion is still ongoing. It's a little more complicated since there's a content dispute where both people seem to be acting in good faith; I think an AfD discussion would be more likely to prevent further edit warring. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 15:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I reverted my removal of the tag, my mistake. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 15:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete A7 no claim to notability Mayalld (talk) 15:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• The article cites no sources, and, searching, I can find no sources documenting this undocumented musical group. The content is unverifiable. But deletion is not required here. Simply revert to the original redirect that pointed to Hereditary Multiple Exostoses. Uncle G (talk) 15:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you look at the history, you'll see that that's exactly what I did. However, it was reverted by the IP, so I decided to get consensus on it here. But yeah, I support redirecting it. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 16:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I didn't realize it had been a redirect before. In that case, redirect, protect, warn the ip, and speedy close. Redfarmer (talk) 16:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore redirect to Hereditary multiple exostoses. No objection to deleting the NN band article first. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as mentioned above. The redirect that used to be there seems to be bad also, since the TLA should be "HME", not "MHE". --Dachannien^Talk_Contrib 08:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• The HME/MHE word order is interchangeable according to the article HME article histories and a Google search. Both TLA's are valid. • Gene93k (talk) 11:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.