The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mention at team articles. v/r - T P 18:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MLS Cheerleading[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Material without context that can easily be rolled into the culture sections of each team's articles. No notable references for the issue in general although individual squads may have coverage. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG. Could maybe have a brief (brief!) mention at the MLS main page. Giant Snowman 17:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ensure that the squad names are in the relevant team articles, and then delete. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:09, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: Into respective team articles, then Delete. Zappa O Mati 23:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: If other editors see fit, bring up cheerleading on individual club pages. But by itself, this article definitely fails WP:GNG. --Blackbox77 (talk) 01:09, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.