The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:53, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Highly promotional article. Fails WP:ORGIND. Article from user that jumped the WP:AFC draft process. scope_creep (talk) 10:50, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks paid, ref bombing of a non notable brand, refs that are there hardly mention the brand and instead talk about the inventor, various non notable awards etc. The brand was created 2 years ago, to get anywhere in that market takes loads of advertising and wp isn't the place for it. Szzuk (talk) 17:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.