The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 12:58, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Macau national under-23 football team[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reference proof notability, fails GNG B dash (talk) 16:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I can't think of a reason why a national under-23 team wouldn't pass GNG. They were involved in qualification stages of the AFC U-23 Championship in 2015 and 2017.[1] An absence of references in the article does not necessarily equate to a lack of available references. Nzd (talk) 17:13, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Nzd. Giant Snowman 08:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep U-23 teams are notable. No reason to think this one is any different. What a waste of time. Smartyllama (talk) 15:25, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep U-23 teams are notable. Needs expanding not deleting. Fenix down (talk) 12:54, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.