The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. "Increasing differences between castes" is not a valid nomination reason. WP:NOTCENSORED. utcursch | talk 19:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maldhari[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Increasing differences between castes,society,tribe, and/or religion/religions Yash Ahir (talk) 07:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion for Maldhari Adding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maldhari[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 07:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 07:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The tribe has plenty of mentions in sources such as the Times of India and other publications. @Yash Ahir: I'm not actually sure what your rationale is for nominating the page: could you clarify which of the criteria you believe it meets, from the list here? ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - No shortage of sources available. Only thing approaching a deletion rationale seems to be something to the effect that we shouldn't be covering ethnic groups because it increases ethnic tensions. Unfortunately, that's not a valid reason for deletion. GMG ^talk 14:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.