The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No issue with draftifying, so happy to provide the content to anyone who wants to incubate it until such time as notability is achieved. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mamadou Guirassy[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A footballer who does not appear to have played beyond college or Guinea U-23 National level. He has been drafted by the Portland Timbers but has not yet played so does not meet WP:NSOCCER. References are not independent, reliable sources and a search for additional sources does not throw up any significant coverage so does not meet general notability guideline either. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:48, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:57, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:28, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article does not meet WP:NSOCCER, probably because it's WP:TOOSOON. Rather than wipe out the article, the best solution would be to WP:DRAFTIFY and allow the article to be moved back into mainspace once he takes the field and NSOCCER is satisfied. Alansohn (talk) 17:21, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:15, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy - may be notable soon, but not at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 13:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and SALT, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 17:32, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Per Fenix down. But Salt is unnecessary because this article is not recreated repeatly. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but also fine with draftify/userfy. Not currently notable enough. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:57, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article still fails, if it gets created a third time then maybe call for a SALT. Govvy (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.