The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:30, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester City F.C. strip[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic has not been covered in significant detail by reliable, third-party sources - fails WP:GNG. Vast majority of content is WP:ROUTINE e.g. "this was the colour in this year" or "the kit was supplied by X" etc. Previous consensus at this AfD and this AfD and this AfD and this AfD and this AfD and this AfD and this AfD and this AfD and this AfD. Giant Snowman 19:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:26, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No indication this club's strip has achieved any significant coverage as a subject matter. Current consensus is that strips are inherently non-notable in themselves. Fenix down (talk) 09:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Significant precedent that a club's strip is non-notable unless there is something REALLY special about it, in which case it would likely receive the widespread coverage which would meet WP:GNG. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 04:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No indication of notability. IJA (talk) 12:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. That's some pretty convincing precedent. Egsan Bacon (talk) 17:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.