The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Bduke (talk) 11:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of its own notability Laudak (talk) 15:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are mentions of appearances in Maxim and on Howard Sern. If this could be sourced, I think there'd be a case for keeping the article. JMalky (talk) 15:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets notability guidelines per WP:MUSIC, particularly third party coverage. Sources are needed, however, with regards to coverage by Howard Stern and Maxim. — scetoaux(T|C) 22:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, since the group meets criterion #1 of WP:MUSIC. I've added a reference to an article about the band in The Oregonian, and there's also this article in SFGate, an article in Out magazine, plus plenty of non-trivial mentions in newspaper articles about tribute bands. (A reminder about AfD protocol: It's unclear if the nominator actually made an attempt to search for sources before coming to AfD, as the guidelines ask of us. ) Paul Erik(talk)(contribs) 02:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
yes I checked. Some references in local newspapers do not speak of musical notability, but you have rifgths to disagree Laudak (talk) 14:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for clarifying. I would recommend that when you nominate an article for deletion that you mention what you did or did not find when searching for sources. Paul Erik(talk)(contribs) 14:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.