The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 01:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Manhunt International 2014[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. Google gives just 39,200 hits, what boils down to a mere 62 unique hits, including related websites and Wikipedia. Most given sources are also related and not independent as required by WP:RS. The Banner talk 14:23, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure This is one in a series of annual events, the others of which have Wikipedia articles and are presumed to meet notability criteria. See Template:Manhunt International. This event is upcoming, so there is a grey area about WP:CRYSTAL, but with ~10 other articles from previous years being covered, it seems likely that this one will have an article too. This could be merged into the main article. Also, this event seems to happen primarily outside of the English language, so there could be non-English sources covering this but which have been difficult to check on English Wikipedia. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 05:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.