The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G5, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibaji). MER-C 02:25, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Manish Garg[edit]

Manish Garg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NACADEMIC. There's maybe one or two 2016 papers that are demonstrated to have an impact on the field, no named chair or other criteria. The brand ambassadorship is pure advertising and shouldn't have any bearing on notability IMO. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:13, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 18:49, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 18:49, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on myself. From [1] it appears that this person was a PhD candidate in 2015. In other words, a graduate student who was part of a research team which appears to be the foundation for any degree of notability. Which makes the bio look even more wobbly. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:40, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• There's no need to waste time on this spam. Deleted. MER-C 02:25, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.