The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per CSD G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.marcopolis.net/about-us.htm. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marcopolis.net[edit]

Marcopolis.net (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedied and deleted twice for blatant promotion, cleared NPP in its current form. Even with the balder promotional language stripped out, I can find no evidence that this company meets WP:GNG or WP:CORP. In fact, I can't find any information on them at all from a secondary WP:RS. Deadbeef 20:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete This is a blatant copyvio of http://www.marcopolis.net/about-us.htm . Most of this article is a verbatim copy, and the remainder is extremely close (just a few words changed) paraphrasing. Meters (talk) 21:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, if this is truly a copyrighted article, delete it. I was only defending it due to removing of peacock terms. This is not my article, it was a deleted article that was removed because of Peacock terms and promotion. When I restored it, I was not aware of copyright infringement. ಠ_ಠ @TNTdonut (talk) 22:04, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

speedy copyvio requested. Meters (talk) 00:49, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.