- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Now passes subject specific guideline. Fenix down (talk) 09:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Marcos Thank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. PROD rejected with no reason given. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 12:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Kosack (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Kosack (talk) 13:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL having never appeared in a fully professional league and does not have enough substantial coverage to pass WP:GNG. Kosack (talk) 12:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - this player's full name is Marcos Vinícius Costa Guedes according to [1]. He came in as a substitute in the 83rd minute for Chennai City F.C. vs Minerva Punjab FC in an I-League match today according to [2], thus meeting WP:NFOOTBALL. Nfitz (talk) 19:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - in light of his appearance for Chennai City, he now passes WP:NFOOTBALL, having made an appearance in a fully professional league. His Soccerway profile also supports this. Kosack (talk) 19:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Seems he meets WP:NFOOTBALL after all. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lack notability. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:41, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - passes WP:NFOOTY Coderzombie (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - essentially, the article was nominated for deletion because the player wasn't notable, but now that he has participated in a fully-pro league game, article should stay. Adamtt9 (talk) 17:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.