The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 20:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mardon[edit]

The individual appears to be mentioned only in Pseudo-Jasher, an 18th century forgery. --Eliyak T·C 19:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I seem to have confused Sefer haYashar (midrash) and Book of Jasher (Pseudo-Jasher) despite my best efforts. This individual is in fact mentioned in a genuine Jewish tradition. Still, Sefer Hayashar should not be considered on a par with the Bible (in terms of notability of persons mentioned therein), and he is only mentioned in four verses at that. --Eliyak T·C 14:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 00:27, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- John Vandenberg ^(chat) 11:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. —Jclemens (talk) 15:24, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete If the article cannot be expand more than what is currently stated I see no reason in having this article. Jon513 (talk) 17:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only if it/he is provably a forgery. IZAK (talk) 09:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.