The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:48, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Addison[edit]

Mark Addison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A few passing mentions of this researcher in news and TV review sources are not enough for WP:N. Rd232 ^talk 18:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. His asserted ability to hold his breath for six minutes might be worth a mention in an appropriate article, but that ability and a TV show do not demonstrate notability. PhGustaf (talk) 18:57, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete researcher where? He does not appear to be a professor either. Nergaal (talk) 23:45, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:BIO and WP:ACADEMIC, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Invitrovanitas (talk) 09:05, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.