The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Onel5969 (talk) 21:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Williamson[edit]

Mark Williamson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced biography of an academic who does not fit WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:NACADEMIC criteria. Websearch did not produce any support for his notability. Onel5969 (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
comment this biologist needs a closer look, edited [1] a book with OUP; published in Nature [2].E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:59, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.