The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 4meter4 (talk) 15:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marnie Hughes-Warrington[edit]

Marnie Hughes-Warrington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A review of the sources shows Hughes-Warrington doesn't seem to satisfy WP:ACADEMIC or GNG. Majority of RS found through google focus on criticism over her school's handling of its music department where she was the spokesperson. They don't seem to show significant coverage of her. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and Australia. TJMSmith (talk) 22:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Reasonable passes of WP:Prof and WP:Author. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep. I found and added to the article 11 published reviews of 5 books, enough for WP:AUTHOR. Unusually for someone in humanities, her citation record also shows heavy-enough citation counts for a pass of WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:31, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: definitely meets WP:AUTHOR based on the number of reviews I found and per David Eppstein. Skynxnex (talk) 23:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per David Eppstein. I also did a rapid RS check and she also received some decent coverage, possibly passing WP:BASIC: the Australian, the Canberra Times. Pilaz (talk) 07:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant BLPN thread that I should have posted earlier.[1] Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Per David Eppstein, seems to meet both WP:PROF & AUTHOR. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Meets WP:Prof and WP:Author. Alex-h (talk) 15:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Article passes WP:AUTHOR , WP:GNG. NMasiha (talk) 18:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Clearly meets WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR. Cabrils (talk) 04:29, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per David Eppstein. Passes WP: AUTHOR. Fifthapril (talk) 07:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.