The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 03:16, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martin John Callanan[edit]

Does not meet the standards for notability as this photographer has not been published and received multiple independent reviews or awards for his work. In addition article is apparently a vanity page created and primarily edited by the subject.

• Delete per nom. Notability questionable, but definitely vanity. Paddles ^T_C 07:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Based on Google hits and other things, I agree with the nominator that this person probably does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards. --Rory096 07:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Advertising & self-promotion. I think it's his resume. Tychocat 09:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Rory096.--Pastafarian Nights 20:40, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete/Userfy WP is not an advertisement vehicle, the only possible place is user's page.
• Delete. Carr

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.