The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 08:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marutheeram Thedi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG & WP:NFILM. Uses only WP:SPS, and google does not yield enough sourcing of this future show. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:39, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG and no notable secondary sources. Pretty obvious WP:NPROMO violation as well. Skirts⁸⁹ 10:17, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Current sourcing doesn't demonstrate notability, and I can't find anything better. There isn't much content in the article, so if the show does become notable in future it wouldn't be a major hassle to rewrite from scratch. GirthSummit _(blether) 10:20, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet general notability criteria, poorly sourced at the moment. Spyder212 (talk) 22:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.