The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Mary-Kate and Ashley video games. J04n(talk page) 18:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mary-Kate and Ashley: Magical Mystery Mall[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game. Only RS I can find that covers it is IGN Atlantima (talk) 21:21, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen for now. Redirect to List of Mary-Kate and Ashley video games. I found a few sources, but not enough to where I'd really say it needs its own article. What I'd really like to say is that we should redirect it to "List of Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen games", but no such article currently exists. I'll try to see if I can knock out a quick article, as I think that there is merit in having an article for their games, especially considering that they're occasionally held up as an early example of game companies beginning to market games towards young female consumers. But as a standalone article? Nah. It just falls short of that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm striking through the old redirect proposal as I've banged together a quick and dirty article for the video games as a whole. It looks like the video games were produced under "Mary Kate and Ashley", so I relabeled it as such. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:59, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I copied this lackluster video game to Wikialpha for archival purposes. Mathewignash (talk) 11:55, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.