- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Mary Kavanagh[edit]
- Mary Kavanagh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim of notability, no secondary sources, does not meet WP:BIO. Rogermx (talk) 17:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:11, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- 14 libraries is not "many". Coolabahapple (talk) 15:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete can find adequate sourcing neither for Kavanagh nor for her book, this is usually the case for books about local history.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 03:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Did a search, unable to find any coverage in RS that would make this person notable and I can see nothing that would meet NAUTHOR here. Fyddlestix (talk) 05:04, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete there are no reliable sources about her.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.