- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Marzouq Zaki[edit]
- Marzouq Zaki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD, player has not played in fully professional league, nor played senior international football, so fails WP:NFOOTY. Contestor of the prod cited this and this neither of which appear to be lengthy enough to be considered "significant coverage" for WP:GNG. Fenix down (talk) 09:24, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - @Nfitz: - are you actually able to tell us what any of these links say. Ignoring the fact that link 1 and link 6 are the same, these are all very short articles of no more than a 10-15 lines each. It's not very helpful simply to dump a load of foreign language links in and claim GNG. It is clear he is mentioned quite a few times, but you haven't provided any context or attempt to translate any of these very short little articles. I still don't see anything in these links, from their layout at least, that would indicate significant coverage in terms of interviews / articles. If these are interviews then there doesn't seem to be much more than a couple of questions in each one and if they are articles in general about the player they really don't go into any depth at all. WOuld help if you could provide context and translation. Fenix down (talk) 08:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It says he is notable. They are all easy enough to read, right-click translate to English. Sorry about the dupe ...Nfitz (talk) 04:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 11:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The claim that the Kuwaiti Premier League is fully pro is not supported by reliable sources. Kuwait is a member of the AFC by virtue of geography, not professionalism. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support your claim with reliable source. I have posted a reliable source.Hitro talk 20:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Australia is part of AFC, this discards your claims about geographical virtues. Hitro talk 20:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Does it matter given the sources provide prove that he meets WP:GNG? Nfitz (talk) 01:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 12:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
-
- Might be, but until there is a consensus to include the Omani league in the list of fully pro league, I act as if it isn't included in the list. Might be wise to close this as "no consensus" and re-nominate it if the consensus of that discussion was to not include the Omani league in the list of fully pro leagues. Mentoz (talk) 21:30, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.