The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G12 (copyright violation from http://www.matriux.com/), if the owner chooses to release the text: G11) advertising. Mgm|^(talk) 09:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matriux[edit]

Matriux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

According to the Matriux web-site, this software has not yet been released (not even as a beta), therefore notability cannot have been established. Only references found on internet are self-promotional (eg. YouTube). The "Overview" section is a copy of the text from the web-site's home page (with a couple of words changed), so it is also likely to be a copyvio. MightyWarrior (talk) 19:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable software that doesn't even exist yet? Hard to establish notability for inclusion there. §FreeRangeFrog 21:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I gaze into my CRYSTAL ball and see this article being deleted. But I have no prejudice about the article being remade when/if this distro actually gets released. Grandmartin11 (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.