The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 19:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Kennedy (ice hockey)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Triggerbit (talk) 00:38, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Yet another in the many hundreds of articles created in open defiance of sports notability standards by an editor eventually community banned from new article creation, the subject of this one had an ephemeral and undistinguished minor league career. Fails every iteration of NHOCKEY ever extant, no evidence he can meet the GNG. Ravenswing 09:09, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a comment that he should be kept because he should be deleted. However, this isn't quite true, nhockey at one point said 100 pro games in the minors was enough, we upped the number at one point. -DJSasso (talk) 12:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is a shame that he didn't get to play for the Ducks (or any other NHL team), or we would not be having this conversation. Sadly fails WP:NHOCKEY. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 15:49, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails to meet either WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 00:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.