The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 00:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Pakes[edit]

Matthew Pakes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The very nicely-written article does not demonstrate sufficient notability of the subject. He's been on a boat, but otherwise that's about it. Naturenet | Talk 21:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Biographies of nonnotable individuals like Mr. Pakes tend to show signs of WP:COI. Given the author's contrib log here, I think a friend of this fellow thought it would be cool to put his bio on WP. It's too bad, I suppose. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 00:06, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:BIO with a splash. --Dhartung | Talk 00:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Nicely written but NN. - Rjd0060 00:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the subject's onboard service doesn't appear to be notable; if he moves upwards in cricket, then perhaps one day, but not at the moment. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Tally Ho! --Sc straker 13:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.