The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anarchyte (talk) 10:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mauser C6[edit]

Mauser C6 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article made by an SPA, no sources, and I'm unable to find anything to so much as verify its existence. While I'm not going to say with certainty that it's a hoax, I wouldn't discount the possibility. Considering the Mauser C96 was selling very well to begin with, and a magazine-fed variant with the same ammunition capacity would confer almost no benefit, I don't see why Mauser would choose to make it in the first place. Loafiewa (talk) 15:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Loafiewa (talk) 15:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Loafiewa (talk) 15:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Searching Google only gives me Wikipedia mirrors and articles about the real Mauser C96. A long-lasting hoax (since 2009) that needs to be gone. Wizzito (talk) 23:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.