The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. NAC. Schuym1 (talk) 16:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maxbashing[edit]

Maxbashing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails Notability, Google yields few results. Written more as an advertisement rather than a substantial encyclopedic article. Flewis^(talk) 10:02, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Tagged for speedy deletion as blatant advertising. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 11:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The Google results don't come from reliable, third-party sources. The page was created by a user who appears to be involved in the organisation the page is about. Sounds like self-promotion to me. I have to admit they did put some consideration into the chronology. Having said that, it's still advertising. Phlyght (talk) 14:14, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.