The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 20:53, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mayurakshi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of WP:NOTFILM. User with a history of WP:PROMO Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails FILM. Quis separabit? 08:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per [1][2] D4iNa4 (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:36, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per meeting WP:NFF. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 16:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @MichaelQSchmidt: WP:NFF indicates that certain films should NOT have articles... It doesn't indicate anything about articles that should have articles. Just because it has commenced filming doesn't make it notable. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - No topic is ever guaranteed an article, but any film may merit an article if it has coverage to meet WP:GNG, no matter where it originates. What WP:NFF explains is that IF a film has begun principle photography AND has coverage, an article my be considered. If you disagree with application of policy and guideline, you are welcome to seek opinions from other Admins.. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.