The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:17, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mayuri Pandey[edit]

Mayuri Pandey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable youtuber, no meaningful, in depth coverage. Praxidicae (talk) 17:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no WP:SIGCOV to meet GNG and 100k youtube followers doesn't pass WP:ENT on its own (See WP:YTN). Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom --Devokewater @ 20:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 20:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 20:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable youtuber.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:58, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above Spiderone 14:19, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lack of independant significant coverage. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:16, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails GNG. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 19:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 04:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Barely found anything about her. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 10:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:09, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 20:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:OUTCOMES and WP:SNOW: we have deleted articles about YouTubers with up to THREE MILLION subscribers. The consensus is to require significant coverage to all such living persons, without exception. Wikipedia:WikiProject YouTube/Notability is merely an essay, but like WP:HAMMER, is accepted by a large number of Wikipedians like me. Bearian (talk) 20:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.