The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anas ^talk? 17:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Medhananda[edit]

Medhananda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

too much fluff; not enough sources Will ^(talk) 13:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by sources? and by fluff?

• Delete This sounds like just a show-off of the books by a certain author, the page is not wikified, and even the talk page of this article shows that the article is a copy-paste from the site of the author. Even the introducion is very confusing in this article. ~Iceshark7 15:03, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for a lack of reliable secondary sources (which seem difficult, if not impossible, to find). Plus, it's either a copyright violation, being a copy&paste job, or it's a conflict of interest. --Huon 21:52, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:33, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:33, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.