The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. AfD is not for merger/redirect suggestions, or for making 'final decisions' on edit wars (even if this were an edit war, which I don't see it is). Non-admin closure. Olaf Davis (talk) 12:39, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Medieval[edit]

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, this page should be merged into Middle Ages (disambiguation). Patchy1Talk To Me! 04:43, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page was a redirect until two hours ago. I don't see why we don't just put it back there. We don't necessarily need a 5 day AFD to do so. In fact, I just did so. --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 04:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: it is clear that an edit war has taken place and will continue until a final decision is made. It has been changed to a redirect several times I see. Patchy1Talk To Me! 04:55, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- What edit war are you talking about? This article has been edited 7 times since August, 2006. That's 7 edits in 3 years, and three of them were you adding "mergeto" and "afd" templates to the article. Two other edits are a misplaced bot edit, and a revert thereof. The remaining two are the change of the redirect to the dicdef you note, and my reversion thereof back to a redirect. Seriously, this is not an edit war, just a misguided newb. Its been undone, and there's not much else to do. --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 05:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.