The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Meenush[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A CSD was declined as having a non-applicable criterion. However, apart from something about Menush on Twitter, this article does not return any other sources. It can't be allowed to languish indefinitely with a maintenance tag, so the community is asked to decide whether to keep it or delete it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete appears to be a hoax. Can't find anything online about any Hindu deity with this name, or in several variant spellings. Ruby Murray 11:17, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Given the poor quality of even some of the well-intentioned writing on Wikipedia, it's hard to tell the difference between an article about a real thing that is so badly written that it looks like rubbish (witness Al (folklore) (AfD discussion)) and a hoax article written by an editor, including the names of xyr schoolfriends/relatives, who blanks it after six months when the joke has worn thin. A search for sources turning up nothing indicates that this article is in the latter category. This is unverifiable. Uncle G (talk) 15:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.