The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Olaf Davis (talk) 22:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne University SC[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Low level amateur soccer club. Has never played at the top level of state league. Hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG Hack (talk) 04:25, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter ^(talk) 04:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter ^(talk) 04:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. The ChampionMan 1234 04:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per WP:FOOTYN, played in a national cup.--2nyte (talk) 12:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – has played in the qualifying rounds of the FFA Cup but I don't feel that satisfies FOOTYN, as 620 teams took part in this year's qualifying competition for 22 places in the actual tournament. GNG is clearly not met. C 679 10:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG. Playing in a qalifying round is not enough per WP:FOOTYN, which is a WikiProject's out-dated essay anyway. Giant Snowman 12:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Giant Snowman 12:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per GS, GNG is most important. FOOTYN might be outdated and an essay, but its principles still apply here, the FFA cup is regional until the round of 32, by FOOTYN, it is only a national competition once a club reaches that stage. Fenix down (talk) 13:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: What is our policy on the FA Cup? I thought any team that took part got an article? --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 17:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The FA Cup is national at all stages though is it not? There are no regional qualifying rounds, so a club has participated at a national level regardless of the level of progress made in the competition. Fenix down (talk) 08:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the case of Melbourne University, they reached the final 64 of the Dockerty Cup. Only the final four of this competition play in the FFA Cup. Hack (talk) 07:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.