The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mere Haaniya[edit]

Mere Haaniya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article creator contested PROD. This is a non-notable film that fails WP:N by not meeting either the GNG or NFILM. I could find no sourcing for it in reliable independent sources after completing a BEFORE check, which would not be expected for a film that debuted in the United States. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - G3 Hoax article. Claims to have starred the entire top brass of the Punjabi film industry and Emma Watson. Sheesh. Jupitus Smart 09:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete: per WP:G1 and WP:G3. DrStrauss talk 18:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.