The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 22:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Brock[edit]

Michael Brock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Borderline notability, reads like a resume. Nominating for community input. No Vote exolon 21:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless sourced (and hopefully cleaned up). Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete per above and also the suprisingly low 32 ghits for "Michael Brock Design" does not help his notability. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 22:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Michael Brock has had incredibly noteworthy accomplishments in the field of Graphic Design that ought to be recognized. The Wiki-community is free, of course, to fact check it all, but the article is entirely factual. --Tyler Brock 05:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Or, hurry up and source it. - Aagtbdfoua 00:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per absence of sources. The content is so close to the biography section of his web site that I'm concerned that there are WP:COPYVIO and/or WP:COI issues.--Kubigula (talk) 21:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.