The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:35, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Deasy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Amateur footballer, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, probable vanity article. WP:PROD removed by article creator. Jellyman (talk) 05:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence of notability. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 07:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 07:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 07:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY as he hasn't managed in a fully professional league. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, and can I add that the infobox photo captioned "Michael trying on a suit in River Island, September 2016" is one of the most amusing things I've seen on WP in a while? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The photo might be the best argument for keeping it. ;) Jellyman (talk) 09:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete added this source. But might just not meet GNG. When relialable sources will be added will change my opinion. MFriedman (talk) 09:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no evidence of notability.Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 11:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as subject has not played in a fully-professional league or in a Tier-1 international match. Fails WP:GNG; Google search turns up the guitarist Mike Deasy, the strength and conditioning coach for the Samoa national rugby union team, and numerous other individuals with the same name, but not this particular Michael Deasy. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 12:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC) That is a snazzy photo. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 14:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, love the photo. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 12:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Same as everyone else before, fails any sort of notability guideline. Adamtt9 (talk) 13:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If notability is an issue, can we at least just put the page into a dormant stage, as eventually Michael Deasy will be managing in a Professional League and need a WP page anyway Deasy (talk) 14:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- See WP:CRYSTAL - you have no way of guaranteeing that at this point in time -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He has not played in fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; argument to keep based purely on needing to have a crystal ball Spiderone 19:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As above. Maybe we should archive the picture though. He may have a future career as male model and become notable that way Djln Djln (talk) 01:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.