The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael F. Giuliano[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Google News and Book searches turn up nothing for "Michael F. Giuliano". Just "Michael Giuliano" brings up a lot - about a host of other people named Michael Giuliano, but not this one. Vanilla Google is much the same, except with the "F." you get Wikipedia mirrors and plenty of "find a person" type sites. The stated accomplishments of the subject listed in the article, such as working for Intel, owning a trademark, being an inventor of unspecified things, and playing college football in some capacity (but not enough of one for sports-reference.com to have any record of it) are not really the sort of things that qualify one for an article in the first place. Egsan Bacon (talk) 02:29, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Claims of notability are very weak, references in the article are very weak, and a good faith search for reliable sources came up dry. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:02, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A psychologist of the same name seems closer to being notable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:41, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete my own searches also turned up nothing better. Fails notability guidelines. FuriouslySerene (talk) 22:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.