The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Lisch[edit]

Michael Lisch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. PROD contested by author without providing a reason. – Michael (talk) 21:14, 14 April 2014

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 21:17, 14 April 2014

• Delete - Per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:53, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Now that he has made his debut, the article meets WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:40, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

* Delete - Player has not played in fully professional league, nor played senior international football, so fails NFOOTY. No indication of any other achievements garnering significant reliable coverage to achieve GNG. Fenix down (talk) 12:26, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - SOurce below indicates player now passes NFOOTY. Needs work to improve to GNG. Fenix down (talk) 07:50, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 20:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, now passes WP:NFOOTBALL. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 11:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the preceding comments. Subject fails WP:NFOOTY and no evidence of other notability seems to exist. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:07, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per new information indicating subject passes WP:N.-Ad Orientem (talk) 15:04, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination withdrawn - He's in the starting 11 for Pittsburgh Riverhounds for today's match which means he meets WP:NFOOTBALL. So this article should be kept. – Michael (talk) 20:32, 19 April 2014

@Mikemor92: can you provide a source for the appearance, I don't see one in the article. Happy to change my vote if this can be done. Fenix down (talk) 11:47, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Fenix down: here. – Michael (talk) 01:22, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - why bother nominating articles for deletion that are with first team, and very likely to start soon. Even if he had been deleted, would likely recreate soon. WP:COMMONSENSE suggests that there is WP:NORUSH and we can afford to wait a few weeks, and see if the article is indeed a keeper. Nfitz (talk) 23:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.