The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Luick-Thrams[edit]

Michael Luick-Thrams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find anything to pass WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. nearlyevil665 12:03, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. nearlyevil665 12:03, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 12:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify - I should not have created this article directly in mainspace. The contents certainly can be grown into content that has a place in Wikipedia, but I too doubt that an article on this untenured professor will reach GNG or NACADEMIC. — Charles Stewart (talk) 06:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or draftify. I found one published review, of two of his edited volumes [1], but that's not enough for WP:AUTHOR. Notability not evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.