The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep The two films would appear to be notable (certainly a notable distributor), and it looks like he had a major role in the films, so I would say that he does meet notability. StephenBuxton (talk) 16:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He wasn't the main actor in any of the films. And assuming arguendo that he was, WP:ENTERTAINER requires multiple major roles. --brewcrewer(yada, yada) 16:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
comment Not quite what I said - I didn't say main role, I said major role. Just to clarify what I do mean as a major role - by being one of the three ninjas mentioned in the title, I would say that a title role can class as a major role. The only exception I can think of to that rule would be anyone named as playing the title role in Waiting for Godot. StephenBuxton (talk) 09:31, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He was one of the three leads (brothers who learn to become ninjas) in two films (which aren't classics, but stalwart favorites in the "family" genre). While that's not a lot, it is sufficient. --Dhartung | Talk 19:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Lead actor in two noted films, so he meets the criteria. --Mickea (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.