The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 01:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Vincent-Rori[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable living artist Jamesx12345 (talk) 20:14, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see any reliable sources that discuss this artist, and thus can't determine notability. Happy to revisit this one if I'm missing something. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:39, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A non-notable artist and quite frankly, perhaps, that there are no reliable sources for the artist. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 03:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence found to indicate that this person meets the notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 06:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability found NealeFamily (talk) 04:36, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.