The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No consensus reached despite being open for several weeks. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Seems just about notable, given much coverage will no doubt be in Chinese. Government-supported & relatively well-established for this area, according to the article. More refs needed. Seems no more obscure than hundreds of American or British events that have articles. Johnbod (talk) 17:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless the event is ongoing (2006-2008 are listed) I'm not sure it's useful or notable. Sabiona (talk) 15:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 00:14, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.