The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 22:02, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MidpX[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Cell phone application, no indication of notability. The one primary source used in the article is the creator's personal blog, and, aside from false positives, Google returns only a trivial mention here. To be sure, Google Scholar did return another hit, but it was from a website my antivirus had already blacklisted. The site in question is in Czech. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 23:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, clearly not notable. --Nuujinn (talk) 18:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 01:43, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable software. Bigger digger (talk) 04:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.