The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:25, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mike kensah[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any references that support the claim to notability per WP:N. Google search comes up with links to YouTube, Facebook, etc., but no significant coverage in reliable sources. Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 23:42, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete No indication of importance. Noom _talk ^stalk 00:02, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. GregJackP Boomer! 21:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as ((db-person)) or ((db-band)). I don't see where the article makes any claim to notability. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 22:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per db-band. No references or indication of notability. —Hue Sat Lum 00:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as unsourced BLP in addition to above. Article creator should not have removed PRODBLP, but since we're here... --Tgeairn (talk) 00:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete following HueSatLum. While it's perhaps too trivial to start an SPI, the proximity of User:Bledge akwasi, User:Mike Kensah, and User:208.54.87.144 suggests puppetry. Meph^talk 01:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Include Mike kensah reference. Meph^talk 01:12, 3 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Delete Unsoured; fails GNG, and I can't find anything reliable online. Electric Catfish 01:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is not eligible for speedy deletion, folks ("He recorded couple of songs with the producers, from which came the famous songs within the Ghana communities..."), but that does not mean it should be kept. With respect to the author, this article does not pass the test of notability and has very little in the way of support from reliable sources that can verify the content. NTox · talk 02:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Considering the underhand manner in which the individual used multiple accounts, and explicit self-promotion in the article, I simply can't infer the credibility of the claim of involvement in producing 'famous songs'. Meph^talk 04:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

I think that you're assuming too much. The A7 criterion is intended to cover claims that are obviously false, of which any reasonable person would agree. I don't think that applies here. It would of course be different if the writer had said "one of the most famous songs in the world", but this statement refers to fame "within the Ghana communities". Also note that the accusation of sockpuppetry here, whether true or not, is serious. In any case, I still advocate deletion. With respect, NTox · talk 04:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update: SPI with the duck-like behaviour. Meph^talk 13:21, 3 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.