The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Milli Deste[edit]

Milli Deste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A newly formed supporter's club, the article was created by one of the founders (link). No pages in the article name space link to this article. The subject matter appear to have no relevant Google hits except this article. In breach of WP:NN, WP:SPIP and WP:COI.] Thuresson (talk) 18:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear administrators,

This fan club will be announced on 1st of March and we will have many hits in Google. Please give us 3-4 days, and I will include all related hits/web-sites about this fan club under the citation paragraph. There is my interview to the local TV channel about this fan club.

Thank you for your consideration.

P.S: I am new to Wiki, so I tried to add this paragraph to this discussion, but undid my own article by mistake.--Shamil55 (talk) 18:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 20:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 20:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 20:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Administrators,

As I mentioned above, I removed the notice by mistake. Thanks for restoring it back. In 3-4 days, I will include all relevant coverage of our supporter group in different media sites. I agree with your point about self-promotion, however a lot of people are already aware of this group and after the opening of it on 1st of March, it will become more of an information page, rather than self-promotion.

If conflict of interest is related to my name, I can exclude that sentence without any problem. Thanks for pointing it out. --Shamil55 (talk) 20:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Addition: I have opened a case about my logo. But no one has replied yet. I wonder why the logo was removed from the web-site. You can check the removal in the history of the page. --Shamil55 (talk) 20:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jkudlick. I do understand that it does not belong here, I just asked. Why are you all so aggressive? :) Thanks, GiantSnowman :) We know that there is no evidence of notability. I asked for 3-4 days to bring the evidence. --Shamil55 (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Shamil55: I did not intend to be aggressive, so I apologize if I seem that way. I merely intended to point you in the correct directions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 22:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jkudlick, no worries. I probably misunderstood it. I e-mailed permission-commons(at)wikipedia.org about license and verification of logo. Anyways, going back to the article. I will post here all new info in 3-4 days. If it still violates any Wikipedia regulations, then you can delete it. Thank you very much for the constructive discussion. --Shamil55 (talk) 23:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.