The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Affirmative action. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 06:45, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mismatching[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or merge to affirmative action. No evidence this single study created a notable theory. Rd232 ^talk 12:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong merge to Affirmative action. This information should be presented there in context. By itself it is given undue weight as one side of a controversy. Jaque Hammer (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. per nominator comments, and other merge commentary. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.