The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - TP 03:42, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Asia Pacific World[edit]

Miss Asia Pacific World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable pageant per WP:GNG. Got no attention beyond the fact that the whole pageant was a set up from the start. Even the winner resigned over it. And a few contestants left the pageant under threats from the pageant "organizers".--BabbaQ (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC) [reply]

• I think we can count in these articles in the same nomination:
• Miss Asia Pacific World 2011.
• Miss Asia Pacific World 2012.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. BabbaQ (talk) 11:39, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I haven't looked through all the sources, but it shouldn't matter why it was in the news. Negative publicity is still publicity. Whatever else this pageant may be, it doesn't seem non-notable. DoctorKubla (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well let's call it what it really is. Its a scam "pageant" troughout with zero recognition in the pageant world.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not notable yet, information about the pageant mostly from the pageant organizer (website), paid press releases, personal website, and websites that may harm the readers' computer. The references cited in the Miss Asia Pacific World 2011 and Miss Asia Pacific World 2012 were mostly from Facebook.--Arielle Leira (talk) 03:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Even though this page was created by myself, but I would like to say delete. According to what Arielle Leira said, yeah sources are not reliable, go on delete the page. :) DeshintaChandra (talk) 12:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.