The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —harej (talk) 20:00, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Pokhara[edit]

Non-Notable leg of the national event which does not require a separate article. Unreferenced, may be original research. External link, at the time of my editing, leads to a closed site. Hitro 17:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I'm sure it has local coverage. Notability is borderline, but it seems okay to me to include. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:03, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Local coverage by a local paper isn't compelling. Their job is to cover local events. Lack of notability is why nobody else covers it. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No real notability established and it very much looks like they're using the WP page as their group's web site Corpx (talk) 05:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Re-open The pageant is going to held again this year after a decade so I think it is relevant for the page to form back. ^[1] ^[2]Yuto1 (talk) 18:39 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.