The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Black Kite (talk) 23:10, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Miss Texas World[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing indepth anywhere. Usual PR and press release articles. Not notable. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 19:06, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If this pageant is not a notable then Miss World America and Miss World aren't notable pageants is the logic that I am getting. I understand not being satisfied with an article but that doesn't mean you randomly flag the article for deletion. IZ041 (talk) 01:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Article can be fixed with a few edits, thus is not a candidate for AfD. See WP:BEFORE & WP:ATD. IZ041 (talk) 04:03, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@User:IZ041 if it can be fixed, then show us some significant, indepth coverage, in reliable sources. WP:RS and WP:SIGCOV needs to be met. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 12:55, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@User:MistyGraceWhite Pageantopolis is a reliable secondary source that can be used. If Pageantopolis is not a reliable source then why is it listed as a useful resource on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants page??????? Here are the sources from Pageantopolis that are used in the article.^[1]^[2] IZ041 (talk) 18:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

References

^ "Miss World USA Pageant". Archived from the original on 2014-10-21. Retrieved 2014-12-19.
^ The American representatives to Miss World 1978-1994

@User:IZ041 in-depth coverage is needed. Just a simple trivial mention does not make a topic pass GNG. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 20:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.